Towards greater adaptation and resilience: the essential role of the insurance sector

Politics and economics
Spotlight
Reading time: 4 min 4 min
15/10/2025

Share

Natural disasters and extreme climate events reduce the lifespan of our buildings and infrastructure – and hence their profitability for investors who expect a return on their investment. Faced with these growing risks, how can we ensure that capital remains available for the projects that cities and citizens urgently need?
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

A growing risk, with insufficient cover

In 2024, natural disasters resulted in economic losses of $368 billion, mainly due to cyclones, severe thunderstorms and floods. But only 40% of these losses were covered by insurance. This lack of cover underlines the urgent need to develop projects that are more resilient and better adapted to the climate – the only way to limit financial and human risks.

By 2050, an additional 2.2 billion people will be living in cities, mainly in Africa, Asia and the Middle East. The infrastructure needs (roads, bridges, networks, etc.) are huge : 94,000 billion dollars in investments to be found between 2017 and 2040 (Source: Global Infrastructure Hub).

Insurance as a driving force for resilience

Investors – whether real estate, infrastructure or institutional funds – are now including climate resilience in their risk management. For them, reinforcing the physical protection of an asset also means protecting its long-term value.

The most cost-efficient time to take action remains at the construction phase: studies show that a dollar invested in resilience can generate between $4 and $16 in benefits. These gains translate into fewer casualties, less damage to property, less interruption to business and lower insurance costs.

The Te Pae Christchurch Convention Centre is highly earthquake-resilient, maintaining its structural integrity and shape even in extreme seismic events. The design reflects a generational shift in understanding earthquake behaviour and building resilience, incorporating knowledge gained from the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes to create more resilient and functional buildings.

New Zealand: a life-size laboratory

Between September 2010 and the end of 2011, four major earthquakes and over 11,200 aftershocks, collectively known as the Canterbury (New Zealand) Earthquake Sequence, shook the region to its core, killing 185 people, injuring several thousand and causing widespread damage. This terrible episode revealed the major role of insurers in resilience, as it became the biggest insured loss in New Zealand’s history and highlighted the vulnerability of so-called “linear” infrastructure (roads, water networks, river management systems) to natural disasters. Following these earthquakes, local authorities had no choice but to re-examine their approach to natural disaster risk management.

Investing differently: the risk transfer approach Risk transfer is a management technique whereby a third party assumes the financial consequences of a risk. In this model, insurance becomes a strategic lever: it doesn’t just provide compensation after the fact, it encourages stakeholders to design for resilience from the outset.

An innovative approach has thus been developed: experts from Aon used disaster modeling and engineering knowledge to better understand the vulnerability of infrastructure to natural disasters.

This approach has made it possible to identify ways of protecting previously uninsurable assets to make them more resilient, alongside risk transfer solutions to manage risks that can be neither controlled nor retained.

The result, despite a tougher (re)insurance market, is that 85% of local authorities have taken part since 2012. This program has resulted in:

  • a better understanding of the risks by gathering data
  • greater resilience through planning
  • long-term access to affordable insurance capital
Christchurch, New Zealand: Cardboard Cathedral with triangular stained-glass façade and A-frame design, built after the 2011 earthquake. Cardboard is a material well-suited to the seismic zones, as it can withstand quakes that might destroy heavier structures built from concrete. Additionally, it lends itself easily to disassembly and reassembly.

This Spotlight was produced in editorial partnership with experts from Aon, a leading global professional services firm.

×